Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/984
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSallie B. King-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-22T11:01:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-22T11:01:43Z-
dc.date.issued1981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tnt.ussh.edu.vn:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/984-
dc.description.abstract工 am indebted to the readers of this study, Professors DeMartino, Kiyota and Yadav for their most helpful comments on the first draft, suggestions which certainly helped strengthen both the conceptualization and the expression of these thoughts. 工 am further obliged tc Professor Kiyota for his help in steering me towards this topic and first stirring my interest in tathagatagarbha thought. He has shown himself to be a wealth of encouragement and moral support throughout the final stages of my studies and a generously beneficent spirit. For these boons 工 am grateful. 工 also owe thanks to the Department of Religion, Temple University, for its generous financial support. In my case this support was especially extraordinary, as the Department proved itself willing to both encourage and support those studies which took me outside the confines of the Department itself. Thanks are also due Mrs. Marilyn Coyne for typing the first draft of the dissertation f a most ungratifying task, no doubt, with all the foreign words and markings. Certain debts cannot be adequately stated, much less repaid. Such are my debts to Professor Thomas Dean, my advisor, who has for years selflessly given of himself that 工 might succeed in completing my degree. Given the kind and number of obstacles which 工 have faced over the years, his aid has been both constantly in demand and crucial to my success. He has given enormously of his time, assistance and concern. A bodhisattva of compassion, thoroughly proficient in the skillful means of negotiating a graduate studies path— it has been my very good fortune to have been guided by him. Finally, unending thanks to my husband, Steve. When difficulties in my studies arose, his unshakable confidence in me has always succeeded in returning me to my task. It is thanks to him that we have maintained in our lives the graduate students1 Middle Path: keeping the study foremost (so that it would be accomplished) yet keeping it also in perspective.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................... vil LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.................................... ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . . ............................... 1 PART ONE: THE TEXTS 14 2. THE BUDDHA NATURE T R E A T I S E ......................... 24A. Introduction and Refutation of Other Views 1. Introduction 2. Refutation of Other Views a . Refuting Hinayana Views: Buddha Nature Neither Exists Nor Does Not Exist b. Refuting Non-Buddhist Philosophies: Buddha Nature Is Not an Own-Nature c . Clarification of Mahayana Views: The True Meaning of the Two Truths Doctrine B . The Essence of Buddha Nature: Bodhicitta, True Nature and Tathagatagarbha 1. Introduction 2. Analysis a. The Three Causes b. The Three Natures c• Tathagatagarbha 3. Evaluation C . Characteristics of Buddha Naturef I: Action and Non-Substantiality 1. Introduction 2. Analysis a- Transformation of the Basis b. Dharmakaya and Nirvana c. The Non-Substantiality of Self a D . Characteristics of Buddha Nature, II: Soteriology 1. Introduction 2. Analysis a. The Man-Buddha Relationship b. The Middle Path c• The Trikaya 3• Evaluation E . Conclusion 3• TWO OTHER TEXTS A. B. The No Increase, No Decrease Sutra 1. Introduction 2. Analytic Summary 3• Evaluation The Supreme Basis Sutra 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Concluding Evaluation PART TWO: THE PHILOSOPHY ONTOLOGY A. Introduction B. Contra Monism C. NondualismOther Aspects D. Conclusion ACTION A. B * C. D, Introduction Action 1• The Supreme Basis Sutra 2• The Buddha Nature Treatise Non-Substantiality 1• Own-Nature 2. Mind 3. Consciousness-Only Conclusion 6. PRACTICE A. Introduction B . Analysis 1• The Buddha Nature Treatise 2• The Supreme Basis Sutra C. Conclusion i £ £ ..................................« • . • • ^HdVHDonaiQ 6 ^ e ............................................... AHvssortD x e e .......... WSIDI.LSÄW aNv ^HDnoHiL anniVN vnaana :xiaN3ddv 6 i e ............................................... iHsnoHi* anniVN VHaana äo sidmvidijinois shi :NOism:)NO:) *8 LIZ uoTsnxouoD *a 50£ A^tx^bh i^ueuiouaiid 30 uot^phxpa eAT^xsod; am *a eoe p u p t w n d -o 66Z ue.^3 *9 ^62 hot 耳 onpcami 1 ^ 6 Z ........................................... wsiHaana 3S3NIHD NO tLHOnOHi SHHtLVN VHaana ^0 ^DNamJNI 3H«! • Len_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSubmitted to the Temple University Graduate Board in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.en_US
dc.subjectKinh điển và triết học phật giáoen_US
dc.subjectLịch sử và văn hóa phật giáoen_US
dc.subjectPhật giáo nhập thế và các vấn đề xã hội đương đạien_US
dc.titleActive Self . A Philosophical Study of the Buddha Nature Treatise and Other Chinese Buddhist Textsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:CSDL Phật giáo

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sallie B. King (1981) Active Self . A Philosophical Study of the Buddha Nature Treatise and Other Chinese Buddhist Texts.pdf
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.accessRestricted???
8.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open   
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.